Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Diane's avatar

I've been told I'm a reasonable person. McCullough's conclusions seem sound, especially the one concluding that 'Long covid' is rather vaccine injury - we should actually stop calling it 'Long covid'. However, none these conclusions rely in any way on there being a 'Covid' virus, an 'Omicron' strain and the rest...He is helping by calling out the 'vaccines' as dangerous BUT continuing to push the virus narrative, and especially in such detail is simply continuing to prime people for fear for the next time. So very many scientists agree that there was no pandemic at all, except a pandemic of fear and reclassification (and Midazolam/Remdesivir/Ventilator/Starvation murders) - A pandemic either happened or it didn't. Dr Rancourt has actually proven there was no pandemic. John Ionidis IFR of 0.15% (this is well known) is not high enough to be able to cause a pandemic - it is perplexing that McCullough keeps on with this virus stuff when SARS-Co-V2 has not even been shown to exist anywhere in the world.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts