I've been told I'm a reasonable person. McCullough's conclusions seem sound, especially the one concluding that 'Long covid' is rather vaccine injury - we should actually stop calling it 'Long covid'. However, none these conclusions rely in any way on there being a 'Covid' virus, an 'Omicron' strain and the rest...He is helping by calling out the 'vaccines' as dangerous BUT continuing to push the virus narrative, and especially in such detail is simply continuing to prime people for fear for the next time. So very many scientists agree that there was no pandemic at all, except a pandemic of fear and reclassification (and Midazolam/Remdesivir/Ventilator/Starvation murders) - A pandemic either happened or it didn't. Dr Rancourt has actually proven there was no pandemic. John Ionidis IFR of 0.15% (this is well known) is not high enough to be able to cause a pandemic - it is perplexing that McCullough keeps on with this virus stuff when SARS-Co-V2 has not even been shown to exist anywhere in the world.
There was a bioweapon. It made some people very sick. Fatality rate was low. Long Covid comes from Spike contamination from both the virus variants and from the vaccine. Hospital Protocols killed more people than the wild virus in 2020. The vaccine killed far more than both.
There is no proof at all there was a bioweapon virus, it doesn't appear to exist anywhere in the world based on FOI responses - the bioweapon is the vaccines. This is an important fact. And speaks directly to the narrative that will drag us under for the next time they announce a fake pandemic. Regular people now speak in terms of 'virus' and 'variants'. This is the vernacular. Perhaps the real virus is one of the mind. Everyone is promoting the virus because they have been given the words to do so. But according to many scientists we don't need a bioweapon 'virus' to explain what happened, right down to deaths by country and county...It is also my understanding that 'spike' contamination is measured indirectly via non-specific antibody proteins...saying only that 'something made these antibody proteins elevate', which is really saying the body has raised an immune response to something, not necessarily a particular protein, like 'spike'. This spike identifying seems a similar lie from the playbook of the PCR test fraud. Further to this would it not be quite out of character for psychopaths' to allow anything to go uncontrolled, such as a real virus, even with a low IFR? And why do they need a bioweapon virus if they have a bioweapon vaccine, of course the two are not mutually exclusive, but why complicate the kill like this when the 'vaccine' would suffice?
They were making bioweapons to deploy to see if their countermeasures worked against them. Take a look at Meryl Nass's recent Substack about how they were doing it. They were exploiting a loophole in the law that allowed them to do this research.
I've been told I'm a reasonable person. McCullough's conclusions seem sound, especially the one concluding that 'Long covid' is rather vaccine injury - we should actually stop calling it 'Long covid'. However, none these conclusions rely in any way on there being a 'Covid' virus, an 'Omicron' strain and the rest...He is helping by calling out the 'vaccines' as dangerous BUT continuing to push the virus narrative, and especially in such detail is simply continuing to prime people for fear for the next time. So very many scientists agree that there was no pandemic at all, except a pandemic of fear and reclassification (and Midazolam/Remdesivir/Ventilator/Starvation murders) - A pandemic either happened or it didn't. Dr Rancourt has actually proven there was no pandemic. John Ionidis IFR of 0.15% (this is well known) is not high enough to be able to cause a pandemic - it is perplexing that McCullough keeps on with this virus stuff when SARS-Co-V2 has not even been shown to exist anywhere in the world.
There was a bioweapon. It made some people very sick. Fatality rate was low. Long Covid comes from Spike contamination from both the virus variants and from the vaccine. Hospital Protocols killed more people than the wild virus in 2020. The vaccine killed far more than both.
There is no proof at all there was a bioweapon virus, it doesn't appear to exist anywhere in the world based on FOI responses - the bioweapon is the vaccines. This is an important fact. And speaks directly to the narrative that will drag us under for the next time they announce a fake pandemic. Regular people now speak in terms of 'virus' and 'variants'. This is the vernacular. Perhaps the real virus is one of the mind. Everyone is promoting the virus because they have been given the words to do so. But according to many scientists we don't need a bioweapon 'virus' to explain what happened, right down to deaths by country and county...It is also my understanding that 'spike' contamination is measured indirectly via non-specific antibody proteins...saying only that 'something made these antibody proteins elevate', which is really saying the body has raised an immune response to something, not necessarily a particular protein, like 'spike'. This spike identifying seems a similar lie from the playbook of the PCR test fraud. Further to this would it not be quite out of character for psychopaths' to allow anything to go uncontrolled, such as a real virus, even with a low IFR? And why do they need a bioweapon virus if they have a bioweapon vaccine, of course the two are not mutually exclusive, but why complicate the kill like this when the 'vaccine' would suffice?
They were making bioweapons to deploy to see if their countermeasures worked against them. Take a look at Meryl Nass's recent Substack about how they were doing it. They were exploiting a loophole in the law that allowed them to do this research.